Why Music?

Life has rhythm and tonal pattern to it. People whitethorn state that they dont pick up to harmony. Is that true? Sound, its tout ensemble around, whether we like it or non. If we live and hear, in that respectforely avoiding melody is impossible. It surrounds us solely, but why? why be people drawn to medicinal drug? wherefore does symphony even exist? The to a greater extent gratifying the singer, the more dexterous the harpist, the more mates he attracts. According to the article Why Music? a cogitate for why people choose to listen and perform medical specialty is because of sex and love. There is around truth in that scheme the better the player is, the more attractive they will be to dominance mates.Many famous singers and band members that argon astray agnisen around the world can convey both their talent and physical appearance for their success. Fans office eff their medical specialty strictly because they are attracted to that sure artist inst ead of to the medical specialty itself. This argument states that music exists average to pass on people to attract and slip away in love, but that may not be entirely true. The author states, A man does not absorb to be gay to enjoy the music of an wholly-male orchestra. This makes sense, and just proves that the argument of sex being the causal agent for music wrong. % of the worlds population has amusia, where they cant understand and distinguish differences in music so would that mean they arent capable to occur in love? There are similarly many songs that are being recorded, performed and enjoyed where their lyrics deplete vigor to do with love, sex or relationships, for example traditional, children and purely instrumental songs. They are considered music, but arent connected to mating. So therefore, this argument, no matter how reasonable cant be entirely true. There has to be a reason that is richly accurate though.So, if its not sex, what else could it be? So cial bond? Music may exist for us because it helps sustain us together just like it did for our prehistorical ancestors the early humans. Before musics emergence, an important favorable bodily function was grooming. Grooming was a vital way to allow primates and animals not only to clean their pelts but withal to socialize. As groups expanded over time, social grooming became harder and the gap was bridged by music, which may thus be seen as a precursor to language, as Dr. Dunbar believes. Nowadays we nevertheless listen to music in groups, and it still is a way to socialize.Concerts, clubs, parties, all are places and events where people who enjoy and share the same interests in music gather together. People may not only get together because of similar adjudicate in music, but they might also have new(prenominal) interests that are the same. But, like the root off hypothesis, it cant be entirely true. Isnt it possible for people to listen to music when they are by themse lves? Of course, it might not be as enjoyable and the whole breeze of it may not be as vivid, but it still is possible. People are constantly listening to their own(prenominal) music players. By themselves.There are also times when people want to listen to music on their own, to allow them to forget e very(prenominal)(prenominal)thing else have about time just to listen and think without other people around them. Adding to this, just pretend that every single person, from all the countries, on this Earth discrete to get together in groups correspond to interests in music. Two problems the groups would be way too voluminous and too hectic also, people might kick subjectstairs different types of music appealing to them, so for that reason choosing only unrivaled group to belong and collar in would be too hard, confusing and just a waste of time.This theory is hard to oblige with, and may be even less likely than the first one. An accident? Or an invention? perchance both, maybe none. Most of us are born(p) with the special ability to hear and either to enjoy or hate the audio frequencys that we notice in this world, and there skills have allowed us to start inventing the music we know today. At least, according to Dr. Pinker he further believes that music is an auditory cheesecake he also suggested that if either music or cheesecake vanished from the species slight else would change. No. This argument has very little value to it, and isnt very convincing.First of all, we arent the inventors of music, macrocosm merely classified certain noise that according to the sound like what music should be. Secondly, music doesnt have to be the work of famous classical composers the tricksy pop songs heard on the radio the unequalled flavor of each countrys traditional music, it can be anything. It is arguable that music can be the sound of a dog panting after a long run water pouring down great and majestic waterfalls the loud traffic at busy intersecti ons during rush hour or clean much anything we hear.For instance, the composer John Cage was one of the first people to breakdown the barriers and rules that music from the past had. He is most famous for his piece 433 where for four transactions and thirty-three seconds, not one single cable is played by the performer on stage, in its place, the whole piece is coming from the noises that the audience and the atmosphere of the place makes, therefore that being the music. Likewise, it is possible to resist with the statement that little would change if music was to disappear.Many, many people wouldnt have jobs such as the numerous musicians everywhere. Visualize a world without any music. None. Movies requisite music to create a mood, just control a whole film without music. What about radios? What could we all dance to? Sing our hearts out to? nobody without music. Countless things around us are establish on music, and our lives wouldnt be complete without it. The more this h ypothesis is thought about, the more mis way outs it contains, and the less believable it becomes.In conclusion, although there are some that seem more accurate than other, none of the three hypotheses are one hundred percent correct for why music exists and why we listen to it. However, there has to be a reason why. Maybe a combination of the first and second hypothesis, with none or very little contribution from the third hypothesis. It is possible that reasons why are because music changes moods, creates atmospheres, and is an escape for all of us. People all listen to music, and too many people take it for granted, without paying attention to it, really thinking and question why we all listen to music.